King.com Limited v Simon Collins (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 15659 (27 April 2015)

The domain name was found to infringe the complainant's trademark and was registered in bad faith, warranting transfer.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2015] DRS 15659
Parties: Complainant: King.com Limited; Respondent: Simon Collins
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 27 April 2015
Procedural Posture: Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome: domain name transferred
Legal Topics: Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement

Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

King.com Limited

Complainant

Simon Collins

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

1 whether the domain name should be transferred due to trademark infringement

Ratio Decidendi

The domain name was found to infringe the complainant's trademark and was registered in bad faith, warranting transfer.

Court Disposition

domain name transferred

Orders

transfer of the disputed domain name to King.com Limited

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.