Ms S Begum v Slough Borough Council and Mr M Jarrett (England and Wales : Disability Discrimination) [2025] UKET 3320578/2021 (7 March 2025)

The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to disability discrimination as the respondents failed to make reasonable adjustments required by law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] UKET 3320578/2021
Parties: Claimant: Ms S Begum; Respondent: Slough Borough Council; Respondent: Mr M Jarrett
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 07 March 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics: Disability Discrimination, Reasonable Adjustments, Unfair Treatment

Employment Law Disability Discrimination Reasonable Adjustments Unfair Treatment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Ms S Begum

Claimant

Slough Borough Council

Respondent

Mr M Jarrett

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was subjected to disability discrimination by the respondents
2 Whether reasonable adjustments were made for the claimant's disability

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to disability discrimination as the respondents failed to make reasonable adjustments required by law.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

Respondents to pay compensation to the claimant
Respondents to review and implement reasonable adjustment policies

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.