Snackwell Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 661 (TC) (13 November 2013)
The drinks in question were correctly classified as 'made-wine' under the statutory definitions, not 'cider', and the appellant is strictly liable for the additional excise duty. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain claims of legitimate expectation or judicial review in this context.
- Citation
- [2013] UKFTT 661 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Snackwell Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Excise Duty Classification, Importation of Alcoholic Beverages, Self Assessment of Tax, HMRC Administrative Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Snackwell Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether flavoured cider should be classified as 'cider' or 'made-wine' for excise duty purposes
- 2 Whether the appellant has any legitimate ground for escaping liability for additional duty due to HMRC's failure to detect the misclassification
Ratio Decidendi
The drinks in question were correctly classified as 'made-wine' under the statutory definitions, not 'cider', and the appellant is strictly liable for the additional excise duty. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain claims of legitimate expectation or judicial review in this context.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Assessments for additional excise duty confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment