Miss K Ashby v Solo Protect Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2019] UKET 1805564/2018 (21 February 2019)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure within the meaning of the legislation and therefore was not subjected to detriment or dismissal for making such a disclosure.

Citation: [2019] UKET 1805564/2018
Parties: Claimant: Miss K Ashby; Respondent: Solo Protect Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 21 February 2019
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Miss K Ashby

Claimant

Solo Protect Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment or dismissal for making a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure within the meaning of the legislation and therefore was not subjected to detriment or dismissal for making such a disclosure.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed