Potter v. Sound Control Modern Music Stores Ltd [2009] UKEAT 0543_08_2301 (23 January 2009)
It was an error to dismiss the protective award claim on paper without evidence when the respondent had not entered a response; such claims should proceed to a hearing on their merits.
- Citation
- [2009] UKEAT 0543_08_2301
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Potter; Respondent: Sound Control Modern Music Stores Ltd (in administration)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Part of Default Judgment (liability Only)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; part of default judgment set aside; case remitted for hearing on merits.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Protective Award, Unfair Dismissal, Failure to Provide Employment Particulars, Redundancy, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Potter
Claimant
Sound Control Modern Music Stores Ltd (in administration)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Part of Default Judgment (liability Only)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it was correct to dismiss the protective award claim under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 without evidence when no response was entered by the respondent
- 2 Whether the Employment Judge misconstrued the meaning of 'establishment' in section 188(1) of the 1992 Act
Ratio Decidendi
It was an error to dismiss the protective award claim on paper without evidence when the respondent had not entered a response; such claims should proceed to a hearing on their merits.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; part of default judgment set aside; case remitted for hearing on merits.
Orders
- Paragraph 3 of the default judgment is set aside.
- Case remitted for hearing on the merits of the protective award claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment