South Crescent Trustees Ltd v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX - TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE - appeal to Tribunal stayed following parties joint application for Alternative Dispute Resolution stay, with Respondents directed to file and serve their Statement of Case upon expiry of stay) [2025] UKFTT 417 (TC) (08 April 2025)
The Respondents' delay in filing their Statement of Case, while not condoned, did not amount to a failure to co-operate to such an extent that the Tribunal could not deal with the proceedings fairly and justly. There was no pattern of non-compliance or irreparable prejudice to the Appellant. The extension of time...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 417
- Parties
- Appellant: South Crescent Trustees Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Interlocutory Applications (extension of Time and Barring Order)
- Outcome
- Appellant's barring application refused; Respondents' extension of time application allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Barring Order, Alternative Dispute Resolution (adr), Statement of Case, Procedural Fairness
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South Crescent Trustees Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Interlocutory Applications (extension of Time and Barring Order)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondents should be granted an extension of time to file and serve their Statement of Case
- 2 Whether the Respondents should be barred from further participation in the proceedings for failure to comply with the Tribunal's deadline
Ratio Decidendi
The Respondents' delay in filing their Statement of Case, while not condoned, did not amount to a failure to co-operate to such an extent that the Tribunal could not deal with the proceedings fairly and justly. There was no pattern of non-compliance or irreparable prejudice to the Appellant. The extension of time was granted to progress the appeal, and the barring application was refused.
Court Disposition
Appellant's barring application refused; Respondents' extension of time application allowed.
Orders
- The Appellant's application dated 7 January 2025 for the Respondents to be barred is refused.
- The Respondents' application dated 20 December 2024 for an extension of time to file and serve their Statement of Case is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment