South Yorkshire Pensions Authority v Burns [2005] UKEAT 0004_05_2604 (26 April 2005)
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by inferring disability discrimination from the employer's failure to clarify the application form during the respondent's visit, as this would have resulted in preferential treatment not available to other candidates.
- Citation
- [2005] UKEAT 0004_05_2604
- Parties
- Appellant: South Yorkshire Pensions Authority; Respondent: Mr A R Burns
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; case remitted to a fresh Employment Tribunal for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Shortlisting Procedures, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South Yorkshire Pensions Authority
Appellant
Mr A R Burns
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in inferring disability discrimination based on the employer's failure to clarify the application form during a post-shortlisting meeting
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred by not referring to a previous Employment Tribunal decision involving the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by inferring disability discrimination from the employer's failure to clarify the application form during the respondent's visit, as this would have resulted in preferential treatment not available to other candidates.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; case remitted to a fresh Employment Tribunal for rehearing.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed in respect of paragraph 6.2 of the Notice of Appeal.
- The case is remitted to a fresh Employment Tribunal for rehearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment