Special Metals (Wiggins) v. Moore [2001] UKEAT 0738_01_2910 (29 October 2001)
There are arguable grounds that the Tribunal's findings regarding the grievance procedure may have been perverse, warranting a full hearing.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 0738_01_2910
- Parties
- Appellant: Special Metals Wiggin Ltd; Respondent: Mr Moore
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Ex Parte Hearing
- Outcome
- Matter to proceed to full hearing
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Grievance Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Special Metals Wiggin Ltd
Appellant
Mr Moore
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Ex Parte Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in finding constructive and unfair dismissal
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's findings regarding the grievance procedure were perverse
Ratio Decidendi
There are arguable grounds that the Tribunal's findings regarding the grievance procedure may have been perverse, warranting a full hearing.
Court Disposition
Matter to proceed to full hearing
Orders
- Full hearing directed
- Chairman's notes of evidence to be provided for specified witnesses
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment