Mr J Chiney v Springbank Mill Ltd and others (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Breach of Contract : Redundancy : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 2400210/2017 (22 August 2017)
The tribunal found that the dismissal was not a genuine redundancy, the procedure was flawed, and the claimant suffered unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. No sufficient evidence of age discrimination or breach of contract beyond the unfair dismissal.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2400210/2017
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr J Chiney; Respondent: Springbank Mill Ltd; Respondent: others
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim partly upheld
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination, Breach of Contract, Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr J Chiney
Claimant
Springbank Mill Ltd
Respondent
others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether the claimant suffered age discrimination
- 3 Whether there was a breach of contract
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the dismissal was not a genuine redundancy, the procedure was flawed, and the claimant suffered unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. No sufficient evidence of age discrimination or breach of contract beyond the unfair dismissal.
Court Disposition
Claim partly upheld
Orders
- Respondents to pay compensation for unfair dismissal
- Respondents to pay sums for unlawful deduction from wages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment