Mr H Whitehouse v Sprint Active Education Ltd (formerly known as Premier Active Coaching Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2024] UKET 1304492/2023 (16 September 2024)
The tribunal found that the respondent breached the employment contract and the claimant was entitled to damages.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] UKET 1304492/2023
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr H Whitehouse; Respondent: Sprint Active Education Ltd (formerly known as Premier Active Coaching Ltd)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract
Employment Law Breach of Contract
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr H Whitehouse
Claimant
Sprint Active Education Ltd (formerly known as Premier Active Coaching Ltd)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent breached the employment contract with the claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent breached the employment contract and the claimant was entitled to damages.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to pay damages to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment