SPS Technologies Ltd v Chughtai (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2012] UKEAT 0204_12_0312 (03 December 2012)
The Employment Tribunal majority erred in law by substituting their own assessment for that of the employer and failing to apply the correct legal test regarding the range of reasonable responses. The dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses, and the procedural defect was cured on appeal. The finding of unfair dismissal cannot stand.
- Citation
- [2012] UKEAT 0204_12_0312
- Parties
- Appellant: SPS Technologies Ltd; Respondent: Mr Chughtai
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Full Hearing of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed, claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Reasonableness of Dismissal, Contributory Conduct, Polkey Deduction, Disparity of Treatment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SPS Technologies Ltd
Appellant
Mr Chughtai
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Full Hearing of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal majority substituted their view for that of the employer in assessing reasonableness of dismissal
- 2 Whether disparity of treatment between Claimant and Mr Fowler rendered dismissal unfair
- 3 Appropriateness of Polkey deduction and contributory conduct findings
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal majority erred in law by substituting their own assessment for that of the employer and failing to apply the correct legal test regarding the range of reasonable responses. The dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses, and the procedural defect was cured on appeal. The finding of unfair dismissal cannot stand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed, claim dismissed
Orders
- Finding of unfair dismissal set aside
- Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment