Miss S Lawrence and Ms L Yates v Square Health Ltd and Push Doctor Ltd (In voluntary liquidation) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2024] UKET 2402744/2022 (13 August 2024)

The tribunal found that the respondents failed to comply with their statutory duty to consult, and therefore the claimants are entitled to a protective award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2024] UKET 2402744/2022
Parties: Claimant: Miss S Lawrence; Claimant: Ms L Yates; Respondent: Square Health Ltd; Respondent: Push Doctor Ltd (In voluntary liquidation)
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 13 August 2024
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Protective award granted in favour of claimants
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Consultation Requirements

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Consultation Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Miss S Lawrence

Claimant

Ms L Yates

Claimant

Square Health Ltd

Respondent

Push Doctor Ltd (In voluntary liquidation)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondents failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy
2 Whether claimants are entitled to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondents failed to comply with their statutory duty to consult, and therefore the claimants are entitled to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted in favour of claimants

Orders

Respondents to pay protective award to claimants

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.