Mr J Austin v St Helens Council (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Redundancy : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 2403390/2017 (20 October 2017)
The tribunal found that the redundancy was not genuine and the dismissal process breached statutory and contractual requirements, rendering the dismissal unfair.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2403390/2017
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr J Austin; Respondent: St Helens Council
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal
Employment Law Breach of Contract Redundancy Unfair Dismissal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr J Austin
Claimant
St Helens Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether the claimant's redundancy was genuine
- 3 Whether there was a breach of contract in the dismissal process
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the redundancy was not genuine and the dismissal process breached statutory and contractual requirements, rendering the dismissal unfair.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to pay compensation to claimant
- Reinstatement not ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment