SCOR SE v Stenning Limited (Full Decision _No Action) [2017] DRS 18624 (29 June 2017)

SCOR SE v Stenning Limited (Full Decision _No Action) [2017] DRS 18624 (29 June 2017)

The complainant failed to establish rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name and failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2017] DRS 18624
Parties
Complainant: SCOR SE; Respondent: Stenning Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
29 June 2017
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Rights, Abusive Registration
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Rights Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SCOR SE

Complainant

Stenning Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name was an abusive registration under the DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether the complainant had rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name and failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name