Peli Products (UK) Ltd v Stenning Limited (Full Decision _No Action) [2020] DRS 22816 (12 November 2020)

Peli Products (UK) Ltd v Stenning Limited (Full Decision _No Action) [2020] DRS 22816 (12 November 2020)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the domain name was an abusive registration under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2020] DRS 22816
Parties
Complainant: Peli Products (UK) Ltd; Respondent: Stenning Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
12 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Abusive Registration
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Domain Name Dispute Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peli Products (UK) Ltd

Complainant

Stenning Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name was an abusive registration under the DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the domain name was an abusive registration under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name