Boyd v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 131 (TC) (23 November 2011)
There was no evidence the P35 return was filed before 23 February 2011; neither the appellant nor his bookkeeper ensured confirmation of submission; honest mistake or oversight does not amount to a reasonable excuse; the penalty is statutory and not plainly unfair; the Tribunal has no power to mitigate the penalty in these circumstances.
- Citation
- [2012] UKFTT 131 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Stephen Boyd; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Employer Penalties, Late Filing, Reasonable Excuse, Mitigation of Penalties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Boyd
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the penalty for late submission of the employer’s annual return (P35) should be upheld
- 2 Whether there was a reasonable excuse for the late filing
- 3 Whether the penalty can be mitigated due to delay in notification or fairness
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence the P35 return was filed before 23 February 2011; neither the appellant nor his bookkeeper ensured confirmation of submission; honest mistake or oversight does not amount to a reasonable excuse; the penalty is statutory and not plainly unfair; the Tribunal has no power to mitigate the penalty in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Penalty of £400 for late filing of employer’s annual return (P35) confirmed
- No mitigation or reduction of penalty
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment