Mr C Wood v Stephen Haigh and Michael Fox T/a Abbey Motor Group (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Public Interest Disclosure : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 1802161/2016 (7 March 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, suffered unlawful deduction from wages, and was not provided with written statements as required by law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 1802161/2016
Parties: Claimant: Mr C Wood; Respondent: Stephen Haigh; Respondent: Michael Fox T/a Abbey Motor Group
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 07 March 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Public Interest Disclosure, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Written Statements

Employment Law Breach of Contract Public Interest Disclosure Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Written Statements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr C Wood

Claimant

Stephen Haigh

Respondent

Michael Fox T/a Abbey Motor Group

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether there was a breach of contract
3 Whether there was a public interest disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, suffered unlawful deduction from wages, and was not provided with written statements as required by law.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

Respondents to pay compensation for unfair dismissal
Respondents to pay compensation for unlawful deduction from wages

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.