Redknee Inc. v Stephen Heather (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17268 (05 May 2016)

Redknee Inc. v Stephen Heather (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17268 (05 May 2016)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer of the domain name.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17268
Parties
Complainant: Redknee Inc.; Respondent: Stephen Heather
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Redknee Inc.

Complainant

Stephen Heather

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer of the domain name.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of the disputed domain name to Redknee Inc.