Phillips v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 262 (TC) (10 June 2010)
Mr Phillips was not trading through properly constituted companies during the relevant period; he appropriated the business and used a defunct VAT number, making him personally liable for VAT registration and assessment. The corporate veil did not apply as there was no functioning company, and the appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 262 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Stephen Lloyd Phillips; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (VAT)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Compulsory Registration Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Registration, Corporate Veil, Company Dissolution, Tax Assessments, Sole Trader Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Lloyd Phillips
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (VAT)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Compulsory Registration Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Phillips should be compulsorily registered for VAT as a sole trader for the relevant period
- 2 Whether the VAT assessment against Mr Phillips is valid given his use of multiple companies and dissolved entities
- 3 Whether HMRC can disregard the corporate veil in these circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Phillips was not trading through properly constituted companies during the relevant period; he appropriated the business and used a defunct VAT number, making him personally liable for VAT registration and assessment. The corporate veil did not apply as there was no functioning company, and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mr Phillips to be registered for VAT with effect from 24 September 2003
- VAT assessment of £138,833 for the period 24.9.2003 to 31.10.2007 confirmed to best judgement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment