Spark Energy Limited v Steven Smith (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 11671 (22 August 2012)

Spark Energy Limited v Steven Smith (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 11671 (22 August 2012)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the domain name was identical or similar, and that the respondent's registration was abusive, justifying transfer.

Citation
[2012] DRS 11671
Parties
Complainant: Spark Energy Limited; Respondent: Steven Smith
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 August 2012
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Spark Energy Limited

Complainant

Steven Smith

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's registration of the domain name is abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the domain name was identical or similar, and that the respondent's registration was abusive, justifying transfer.

Court Disposition

transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.