Spark Energy Limited v Steven Smith (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 11671 (22 August 2012)
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the domain name was identical or similar, and that the respondent's registration was abusive, justifying transfer.
- Citation
- [2012] DRS 11671
- Parties
- Complainant: Spark Energy Limited; Respondent: Steven Smith
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Spark Energy Limited
Complainant
Steven Smith
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the respondent's registration of the domain name is abusive
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the domain name was identical or similar, and that the respondent's registration was abusive, justifying transfer.
Court Disposition
transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment