Fraser v Revenue & Customs (VAT - DIY House Builders Scheme) [2019] UKFTT 573 (TC) (12 September 2019)
The property was completed by December 2015 (or at the latest June 2016), and the appellant could have submitted alternative evidence of completion. The statutory three-month time limit for claiming a VAT refund is absolute, and the claim was made out of time. The Tribunal has no discretion to extend the time limit regardless of the circumstances.
- Citation
- [2019] UKFTT 573 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Stewart Fraser; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Refund Appeal (diy House Builders Scheme) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Refund, DIY House Builders Scheme, Statutory Time Limits, Definition of Completion, Administrative Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stewart Fraser
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Refund Appeal (diy House Builders Scheme) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's claim for a VAT refund was made within the statutory time limit under Regulation 201 of the 1995 Regulations
- 2 Whether the definition of 'completion' for the purposes of the time limit required the issue of a completion certificate
Ratio Decidendi
The property was completed by December 2015 (or at the latest June 2016), and the appellant could have submitted alternative evidence of completion. The statutory three-month time limit for claiming a VAT refund is absolute, and the claim was made out of time. The Tribunal has no discretion to extend the time limit regardless of the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appellant's claim for a VAT refund is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment