Strongwork Construction v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKFTT 292 (TC) (03 November 2009)
The appellant failed the compliance test due to 10 late PAYE payments outside the permitted tolerances, and did not establish a reasonable excuse for the defaults. The tribunal has no discretion to consider proportionality. HMRC was correct to remove gross payment status.
- Citation
- [2009] UKFTT 292 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Strongwork Construction Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Construction Industry Scheme, Gross Payment Status, PAYE Compliance, Reasonable Excuse, Proportionality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Strongwork Construction Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant failed the compliance test for gross payment status under the Construction Industry Scheme
- 2 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for late PAYE payments
- 3 Whether proportionality should be considered in removal of gross payment status
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed the compliance test due to 10 late PAYE payments outside the permitted tolerances, and did not establish a reasonable excuse for the defaults. The tribunal has no discretion to consider proportionality. HMRC was correct to remove gross payment status.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Gross payment status removal by HMRC upheld
- Right to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to Rule 39 of the Rules
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment