Stuart Moore v Revenue and Customs (VAT registration and assessment - application to strike out) [2025] UKFTT 1599 (TC) (17 December 2025)
The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to consider complaints about HMRC's internal processes and cannot entertain an appeal against a VAT assessment where no VAT return has been submitted. The appellant accepted exceeding the VAT registration threshold, so the factual basis for registration is not in dispute. The appeal has no reasonable prospect of success and must be struck out.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 1599 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Stuart Moore; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Registration and Assessment Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out
- Legal Topics
- VAT Registration, VAT Assessment, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Strike Out Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stuart Moore
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Registration and Assessment Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider complaints about HMRC's internal processes
- 2 Whether the appeal against VAT registration and assessment has a reasonable prospect of success
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to consider complaints about HMRC's internal processes and cannot entertain an appeal against a VAT assessment where no VAT return has been submitted. The appellant accepted exceeding the VAT registration threshold, so the factual basis for registration is not in dispute. The appeal has no reasonable prospect of success and must be struck out.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out
Orders
- The appeal is struck out pursuant to Rules 8(2)(a) and 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment