Ediciones Del Prado, SA v Oates [2007] DRS 4333 (23 February 2007)
The complainant established rights in the 'Del Prado' mark, which is identical to the disputed domain name. The respondent offered to sell the domain for £2,500, far exceeding out-of-pocket costs, and provided no evidence of bona fide use. The expert inferred the domain was registered primarily for sale to the complainant or a competitor, constituting abusive registration.
- Citation
- [2007] DRS 4333
- Parties
- Complainant: Ediciones Del Prado, S. A.; Respondent: Stuart Oates
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Domain name transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trademark Infringement, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ediciones Del Prado, S. A.
Complainant
Stuart Oates
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the 'Del Prado' mark, which is identical to the disputed domain name. The respondent offered to sell the domain for £2,500, far exceeding out-of-pocket costs, and provided no evidence of bona fide use. The expert inferred the domain was registered primarily for sale to the complainant or a competitor, constituting abusive registration.
Court Disposition
Domain name transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name 'delprado.co.uk' is to be transferred to the complainant, Ediciones Del Prado S. A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment