Marshalls Mono Limited v Stuart Truslove (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 20005 (28 May 2018)

Marshalls Mono Limited v Stuart Truslove (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 20005 (28 May 2018)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer of the domain name.

Citation
[2018] DRS 20005
Parties
Complainant: Marshalls Mono Limited; Respondent: Stuart Truslove
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
28 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marshalls Mono Limited

Complainant

Stuart Truslove

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's registration is abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer of the domain name.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.