Mr M Chadwick v Sue Ryder (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure : Sex Discrimination) [2017] UKET 2405420/2016 (17 July 2017)
The Tribunal found that the claimant was not subjected to unlawful detriment or discrimination as alleged, as the respondent's actions were justified and not connected to the protected disclosure or the claimant's sex.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2405420/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr M Chadwick; Respondent: Sue Ryder
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Sex Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr M Chadwick
Claimant
Sue Ryder
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure
- 2 Whether the claimant was discriminated against on the basis of sex
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the claimant was not subjected to unlawful detriment or discrimination as alleged, as the respondent's actions were justified and not connected to the protected disclosure or the claimant's sex.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment