Mr D Dee v Suffolk County Council: (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 3402052/2015 (2 May 2017)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to follow a fair procedure and did not have sufficient grounds for dismissal, resulting in a finding of unfair dismissal and breach of contract.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 3402052/2015
Parties: Claimant: Mr D Dee; Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 02 May 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Unfair Dismissal

Employment Law Breach of Contract Unfair Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr D Dee

Claimant

Suffolk County Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether there was a breach of contract by the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to follow a fair procedure and did not have sufficient grounds for dismissal, resulting in a finding of unfair dismissal and breach of contract.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal and breach of contract

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.