Sugar Ray's Wine Bar v Richmond [1998] UKEAT 1233_97_1707 (17 July 1998)

Sugar Ray's Wine Bar v Richmond [1998] UKEAT 1233_97_1707 (17 July 1998)

The appellant failed to provide a credible or satisfactory explanation for the delay in lodging the appeal, and no legitimate excuse was established; therefore, the Registrar's refusal to extend time was correct.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] UKEAT 1233_97_1707
Parties
Appellant: Sugar Ray's Win Bar; Respondent: Mr Richmond
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
17 July 1998
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Industrial Tribunal Decisions
Employment Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Industrial Tribunal Decisions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sugar Ray's Win Bar

Appellant

Mr Richmond

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in lodging the Notice of Appeal
  2. 2 Whether it is just and equitable to extend time for appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to provide a credible or satisfactory explanation for the delay in lodging the appeal, and no legitimate excuse was established; therefore, the Registrar's refusal to extend time was correct.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed