Sugar Ray's Wine Bar v Richmond [1998] UKEAT 1233_97_1707 (17 July 1998)
The appellant failed to provide a credible or satisfactory explanation for the delay in lodging the appeal, and no legitimate excuse was established; therefore, the Registrar's refusal to extend time was correct.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 1233_97_1707
- Parties
- Appellant: Sugar Ray's Win Bar; Respondent: Mr Richmond
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Industrial Tribunal Decisions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sugar Ray's Win Bar
Appellant
Mr Richmond
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in lodging the Notice of Appeal
- 2 Whether it is just and equitable to extend time for appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to provide a credible or satisfactory explanation for the delay in lodging the appeal, and no legitimate excuse was established; therefore, the Registrar's refusal to extend time was correct.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment