McMullan v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKFTT 367 (TC) (15 December 2009)

McMullan v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKFTT 367 (TC) (15 December 2009)

No surcharge is payable where tax was paid by the relevant dates and not refunded as of those dates; the existence of a default is determined at the start of the relevant day, and if no default exists, the question of reasonable excuse does not arise.

Citation
[2009] UKFTT 367 (TC)
Parties
Appellant: SW McMullan; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Income Tax)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
15 December 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Determination Without a Hearing Under Rule 26
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Income Tax, Surcharge, Late Payment, Taxes Management Act 1970, Reasonable Excuse

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SW McMullan

Appellant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Income Tax)

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Determination Without a Hearing Under Rule 26

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was in default for unpaid income tax on the relevant surcharge dates under section 59C(2) and (3) Taxes Management Act 1970
  2. 2 Whether a surcharge was properly levied when tax was paid by the relevant dates but later refunded

Ratio Decidendi

No surcharge is payable where tax was paid by the relevant dates and not refunded as of those dates; the existence of a default is determined at the start of the relevant day, and if no default exists, the question of reasonable excuse does not arise.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Surcharge levied by HMRC set aside