Lakeside Physiotherapy Clinic Ltd v Synaptec Solutions Ltd (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18314 (09 February 2017)

Lakeside Physiotherapy Clinic Ltd v Synaptec Solutions Ltd (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18314 (09 February 2017)

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the domain name was an Abusive Registration. The respondent failed to demonstrate any rights or legitimate interests.

Citation
[2017] DRS 18314
Parties
Complainant: Lakeside Physiotherapy Clinic Ltd; Respondent: Synaptec Solutions Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
09 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Passing Off

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lakeside Physiotherapy Clinic Ltd

Complainant

Synaptec Solutions Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name should be transferred to the complainant

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the domain name was an Abusive Registration. The respondent failed to demonstrate any rights or legitimate interests.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.