United Kingdom Judgment

(T) PSA Automobiles SA & Others v Autoliv AB & Others [2025] CAT 9 (21 February 2025)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal held that the applicants established a prima facie case for follow-on damages based on the European Commission's infringement decision, subject to further determination of quantum and causation.

Court disposition

Partially allowed

Orders

  • The claim is allowed in part, with quantum and causation to be determined at a later stage.
  • Directions given for further submissions on damages.

02

Material facts

Parties

PSA Automobiles SA & Others

Applicant

Autoliv AB & Others

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Competition Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicants argued that the respondents participated in a cartel that caused them loss and that they are entitled to damages as a result of the European Commission's infringement decision.
Respondent
The respondents denied liability, challenged the causation and quantum of damages, and raised issues regarding limitation and jurisdiction.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act 1998, Section 47A

    Follow-on damages claims are permissible where a competition authority has found an infringement.

  2. 02

    Case law and Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules

    Claimants must prove causation and quantum of loss, even in follow-on claims.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal held that the applicants established a prima facie case for follow-on damages based on the European Commission's infringement decision, subject to further determination of quantum and causation.

Court disposition

Partially allowed

  • The claim is allowed in part, with quantum and causation to be determined at a later stage.
  • Directions given for further submissions on damages.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2025] CAT 9

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] United Kingdom Competition Appeals Tribunal You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Competition Appeals Tribunal >> (T) PSA Automobiles SA & Others v Autoliv AB & Others [2025] CAT 9 (21 February 2025) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/CAT/2025/9.html Cite as: [2025] CAT 9 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] (T) PSA Automobiles SA & Others v Autoliv AB & Others [2025] CAT 9 (21 February 2025) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 9.pdf BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/CAT/2025/9.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act 1998, Section 47A

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.