Talon Engineering Ltd v Smith (UNFAIR DISMISSAL - Reasonableness of dismissal) [2018] UKEAT 0236_17_2003 (20 March 2018)
The Employment Tribunal was entitled to find the dismissal unfair due to the Respondent's unreasonable refusal to postpone the disciplinary hearing for union representation, regardless of compliance with section 10(5) Employment Relations Act 1999. The Tribunal correctly assessed contributory fault and Polkey deduction, and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2018] UKEAT 0236_17_2003
- Parties
- Claimant: Mrs Smith; Respondent: Talon Engineering Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Tribunal decision upheld
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Contributory Fault, Polkey Deduction, Trade Union Rights, Disciplinary Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Smith
Claimant
Talon Engineering Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the dismissal of the Claimant unfair due to refusal to postpone the disciplinary hearing for union representation?
- 2 Did the Claimant contribute to her dismissal?
- 3 Was the Polkey deduction correctly applied?
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal was entitled to find the dismissal unfair due to the Respondent's unreasonable refusal to postpone the disciplinary hearing for union representation, regardless of compliance with section 10(5) Employment Relations Act 1999. The Tribunal correctly assessed contributory fault and Polkey deduction, and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Tribunal decision upheld
Orders
- No adjustment under section 207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Compensation awarded: basic award reduced by 15% for contributory fault; compensatory award reduced by 15% for contributory fault and further 15% for Polkey deduction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment