Tate & Lyle Sugars v Daniel [1995] UKEAT 928_94_2510 (25 October 1995)
The Tribunal's decision was set aside because it failed to adequately explain why the employer's investigation and procedures were unreasonable, focused on its own findings rather than what was before the employer at the time of dismissal, and did not properly address whether the appeal process was fair. The case...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 928_94_2510
- Parties
- Appellant: Tate & Lyle Sugars; Respondent: Daniel
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Decision of the Industrial Tribunal set aside; case remitted for rehearing by a differently constituted Tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Disciplinary Procedures
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tate & Lyle Sugars
Appellant
Daniel
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of the respondent was unfair under employment law
- 2 Whether the employer conducted a reasonable investigation prior to dismissal
- 3 Whether the appeal process within the company was procedurally fair
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's decision was set aside because it failed to adequately explain why the employer's investigation and procedures were unreasonable, focused on its own findings rather than what was before the employer at the time of dismissal, and did not properly address whether the appeal process was fair. The case was remitted for rehearing by a differently constituted Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Decision of the Industrial Tribunal set aside; case remitted for rehearing by a differently constituted Tribunal.
Orders
- Remit the matter to an Industrial Tribunal differently constituted for rehearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment