Taylorplan Services Ltd v Shwartzberg [1997] UKEAT 1094_95_1601 (16 January 1997)
The Tribunal's finding that three months was a reasonable period for fair dismissal was not so plainly wrong or excessive as to be perverse; the manner of Mrs Shwartzberg's dismissal was unfair due to abrupt and poorly managed consultation, but redundancy itself was inevitable.
- Citation
- [1997] UKEAT 1094_95_1601
- Parties
- Appellant: Taylorplan Services Ltd; Respondent/cross Appellant: Mrs Shwartzberg
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal and Cross Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Consultation Period, Transfer of Undertakings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Taylorplan Services Ltd
Appellant
Mrs Shwartzberg
Respondent/cross Appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal and Cross Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Shwartzberg's dismissal was unfair due to the manner of redundancy consultation and process
- 2 Whether the period for fair dismissal should be longer or shorter than three months
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's finding that three months was a reasonable period for fair dismissal was not so plainly wrong or excessive as to be perverse; the manner of Mrs Shwartzberg's dismissal was unfair due to abrupt and poorly managed consultation, but redundancy itself was inevitable.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- No change to the Tribunal's award of 13 weeks' loss of net wages as compensation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment