Sparrey v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 823 (TC) (20 August 2014)

Sparrey v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 823 (TC) (20 August 2014)

The employer (Adra Match Ltd), either directly or through its agent Goodwille, did not take reasonable care in administering PAYE. There was insufficient enquiry or liaison regarding the appellant's previous income, and the employer cannot simply rely on an agent without ensuring proper checks. Therefore, the direction transferring liability to the appellant was not justified.

Citation
[2014] UKFTT 823
Parties
Appellant: Ted Sparrey; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
20 August 2014
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Direction Notice (tax Liability Under Paye) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
PAYE Under Deduction, Employer Liability, Reasonable Care, Error in Good Faith, Income Tax
Tax Law PAYE Under Deduction Employer Liability Reasonable Care Error in Good Faith Income Tax

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ted Sparrey

Appellant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal Against Direction Notice (tax Liability Under Paye) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the employer (Adra Match Ltd) took reasonable care to deduct the correct amount of tax under PAYE
  2. 2 Whether the underpayment arose from an error made in good faith
  3. 3 Whether liability for under-deducted tax should be transferred to the employee

Ratio Decidendi

The employer (Adra Match Ltd), either directly or through its agent Goodwille, did not take reasonable care in administering PAYE. There was insufficient enquiry or liaison regarding the appellant's previous income, and the employer cannot simply rely on an agent without ensuring proper checks. Therefore, the direction transferring liability to the appellant was not justified.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Direction under Regulation 72(5) Condition A set aside; liability for under-deducted tax does not transfer to the appellant.