Telement Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 470 (TC) (06 October 2010)
The Tribunal found that Telement Limited ought to have known, and in fact had blind-eye knowledge amounting to constructive knowledge, that its transaction was connected to MTIC fraud due to numerous suspicious features and inadequate due diligence. This suffices to deny input tax deduction under VAT law.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 470
- Parties
- Appellant: Telement Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Input Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- MTIC Fraud, Input Tax Deduction, Constructive Knowledge, Due Diligence, Balance of Probabilities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Telement Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Input Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Appellant knew or ought to have known that its transaction was connected to MTIC fraud
- 2 Whether blind-eye knowledge suffices for actual knowledge under VAT law
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that Telement Limited ought to have known, and in fact had blind-eye knowledge amounting to constructive knowledge, that its transaction was connected to MTIC fraud due to numerous suspicious features and inadequate due diligence. This suffices to deny input tax deduction under VAT law.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant to pay HMRC’s costs of and incidental to the appeal on the standard basis by a tax judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment