Majid v Tesco Stores Ltd [2009] UKEAT 0194_09_2909 (29 September 2009)
The Claimant failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements for lodging an appeal, including timely request for written reasons and submission of a valid Notice of Appeal. No sufficient justification for the delay was provided, and the appeal had no reasonable prospect of success. Therefore, the extension of time was refused and the appeal dismissed.
- Citation
- [2009] UKEAT 0194_09_2909
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Mr A Majid; Respondent: Tesco Stores
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal / Preliminary Hearing on Extension of Time for Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Unfair Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Practice Direction Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr A Majid
Appellant/claimant
Tesco Stores
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal / Preliminary Hearing on Extension of Time for Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant should be granted an extension of time to lodge a Notice of Appeal
- 2 Whether the Claimant's failure to comply with procedural requirements can be excused
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements for lodging an appeal, including timely request for written reasons and submission of a valid Notice of Appeal. No sufficient justification for the delay was provided, and the appeal had no reasonable prospect of success. Therefore, the extension of time was refused and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Extension of time to appeal refused
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment