Miss J Hughes v Tesco Stores Ltd (England and Wales : Redundancy) [2025] UKET 3305742/2024 (31 January 2025)

The tribunal found that the dismissal was by reason of redundancy and that the respondent followed a fair procedure, including consultation and consideration of alternatives.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] UKET 3305742/2024
Parties: Claimant: Miss J Hughes; Respondent: Tesco Stores Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 31 January 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal

Employment Law Redundancy Unfair Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Miss J Hughes

Claimant

Tesco Stores Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 whether the claimant's dismissal was by reason of redundancy
2 whether the redundancy process was fair

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the dismissal was by reason of redundancy and that the respondent followed a fair procedure, including consultation and consideration of alternatives.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.