Miss M Keens-Betts v The Anthony Gregg Partnership Ltd: (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Disability Discrimination : Religion or Belief Discrimination : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 2208102/2016 (5 May 2017)

Miss M Keens-Betts v The Anthony Gregg Partnership Ltd: (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Disability Discrimination : Religion or Belief Discrimination : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 2208102/2016 (5 May 2017)

The tribunal determined whether the claimant had established facts from which discrimination could be inferred and whether the respondent could provide a non-discriminatory explanation. The tribunal also considered whether any deductions from wages were lawful under the contract or statute.

Citation
[2017] UKET 2208102/2016
Parties
Claimant: Miss M Keens-Betts; Respondent: The Anthony Gregg Partnership Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 May 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in provided text
Legal Topics
Age Discrimination, Disability Discrimination, Religion or Belief Discrimination, Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination Disability Discrimination Religion or Belief Discrimination Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miss M Keens-Betts

Claimant

The Anthony Gregg Partnership Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to age discrimination
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to disability discrimination
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was subjected to religion or belief discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the claimant had established facts from which discrimination could be inferred and whether the respondent could provide a non-discriminatory explanation. The tribunal also considered whether any deductions from wages were lawful under the contract or statute.

Court Disposition

Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in provided text