The Attorney General (Appellant) v Universal Projects Limited (Respondent) (Trinidad & Tobago)

The Attorney General (Appellant) v Universal Projects Limited (Respondent) (Trinidad & Tobago)

An application to set aside a default judgment entered pursuant to a court order imposing a sanction is governed by CPR 26.7, not CPR 13.3. The defendant failed to provide a good explanation for the breach and did not satisfy the requirements for relief from sanctions. The court's inherent jurisdiction cannot be used to circumvent the express provisions of the rules.

Citation
[2011] UKPC 37
Parties
Appellant: The Attorney General; Respondent: Universal Projects Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
20 October 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Default Judgment, Relief From Sanctions, Setting Aside Judgment, Case Management, Abuse of Process
Civil Procedure Default Judgment Relief From Sanctions Setting Aside Judgment Case Management Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Attorney General

Appellant

Universal Projects Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an application to set aside a default judgment following non-compliance with a court order is governed by CPR 13.3 or CPR 26.7
  2. 2 Whether the defendant satisfied the conditions for relief from sanctions under CPR 26.7
  3. 3 Whether the court retains a residual jurisdiction to set aside judgment to prevent abuse of process

Ratio Decidendi

An application to set aside a default judgment entered pursuant to a court order imposing a sanction is governed by CPR 26.7, not CPR 13.3. The defendant failed to provide a good explanation for the breach and did not satisfy the requirements for relief from sanctions. The court's inherent jurisdiction cannot be used to circumvent the express provisions of the rules.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The parties have 28 days to make submissions on costs.