Miss H Taylor v Thomas Cook Airlines Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2023] UKET 2407566/2021 (6 January 2023)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and the claimant is entitled to a protective award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2023] UKET 2407566/2021
Parties: Claimant: Miss H Taylor; Respondent: Thomas Cook Airlines Ltd (in compulsory liquidation); Respondent: Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 06 January 2023
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Employee Rights

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Employee Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Miss H Taylor

Claimant

Thomas Cook Airlines Ltd (in compulsory liquidation)

Respondent

Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy
2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and the claimant is entitled to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Protective award granted in favour of the claimant

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.