Mr N Dudleston v Thomas Cook Group plc (in Compulsory Liquidation) and The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2021] UKET 2204471/2019 (22 December 2021)
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
- Citation
- [2021] UKET 2204471/2019
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr N Dudleston; Respondent: Thomas Cook Group plc (in Compulsory Liquidation); Respondent: The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award
- Outcome
- Protective award granted
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Consultation Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr N Dudleston
Claimant
Thomas Cook Group plc (in Compulsory Liquidation)
Respondent
The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to collective redundancies
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a protective award
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
Court Disposition
Protective award granted
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay a protective award to the claimant for the failure to consult as required by law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment