Mr N Dudleston v Thomas Cook Group plc (in Compulsory Liquidation) and The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2021] UKET 2204471/2019 (22 December 2021)

Mr N Dudleston v Thomas Cook Group plc (in Compulsory Liquidation) and The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2021] UKET 2204471/2019 (22 December 2021)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.

Citation
[2021] UKET 2204471/2019
Parties
Claimant: Mr N Dudleston; Respondent: Thomas Cook Group plc (in Compulsory Liquidation); Respondent: The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 December 2021
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award
Outcome
Protective award granted
Legal Topics
Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Consultation Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr N Dudleston

Claimant

Thomas Cook Group plc (in Compulsory Liquidation)

Respondent

The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award

  1. 1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to collective redundancies
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted

Orders

  • The respondent is ordered to pay a protective award to the claimant for the failure to consult as required by law.