Mr H Nightingale v Thomas Cook Group plc (In Compulsory Liqudiation) and The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2023] UKET 2204572/2019 (17 April 2023)

Mr H Nightingale v Thomas Cook Group plc (In Compulsory Liqudiation) and The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2023] UKET 2204572/2019 (17 April 2023)

The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements and awarded a protective award to the claimant.

Citation
[2023] UKET 2204572/2019
Parties
Claimant: Mr H Nightingale; Respondent: Thomas Cook Group plc (In Compulsory Liquidation); Respondent: The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
17 April 2023
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Protective award granted
Legal Topics
Protective Award, Redundancy, Collective Consultation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr H Nightingale

Claimant

Thomas Cook Group plc (In Compulsory Liquidation)

Respondent

The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements and awarded a protective award to the claimant.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted

Orders

  • The respondent is ordered to pay a protective award to the claimant for the failure to consult as required by law.