Mr J Williams v Thomas Cook Group plc (in Compulsory Liquidation) and others (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2021] UKET 2416701/2019 (4 May 2021)
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult, and therefore a protective award was appropriate.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] UKET 2416701/2019
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr J Williams; Respondent: Thomas Cook Group plc (in Compulsory Liquidation) and others
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award
- Outcome
- Protective award granted
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Failure to Consult
Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Failure to Consult
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr J Williams
Claimant
Thomas Cook Group plc (in Compulsory Liquidation) and others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to consult with employee representatives as required under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- 2 Whether a protective award should be made to the claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult, and therefore a protective award was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Protective award granted
Orders
- Respondent to pay protective award to claimant for failure to consult under section 188 TULRCA 1992
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment