Miss K Thomson v Thomas Cook (in compulsory liquidation) and The Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2023] UKET 3324974/2019 (29 March 2023)
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
- Citation
- [2023] UKET 3324974/2019
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss K Thomson; Respondent: Thomas Cook (in compulsory liquidation); Respondent: The Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Protective award granted in favour of the claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Redundancy, Collective Consultation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Miss K Thomson
Claimant
Thomas Cook (in compulsory liquidation)
Respondent
The Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a protective award
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
Court Disposition
Protective award granted in favour of the claimant.
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay a protective award to the claimant, to be paid by the Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment