Miss J Standish-Leigh v Thomas Cook plc (in Compulsory Liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2023] UKET 3303131/2021 (10 February 2023)

Miss J Standish-Leigh v Thomas Cook plc (in Compulsory Liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2023] UKET 3303131/2021 (10 February 2023)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its statutory duty to consult employees prior to redundancy, entitling the claimant to a protective award.

Citation
[2023] UKET 3303131/2021
Parties
Claimant: Miss J Standish-Leigh; Respondent: Thomas Cook plc (in Compulsory Liquidation); Respondent: Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
10 February 2023
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Protective award granted
Legal Topics
Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Employee Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miss J Standish-Leigh

Claimant

Thomas Cook plc (in Compulsory Liquidation)

Respondent

Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent failed to consult employees as required under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 before making redundancies
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its statutory duty to consult employees prior to redundancy, entitling the claimant to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted

Orders

  • The claimant is entitled to a protective award for the respondent's failure to consult as required by law.