Brown v London Central Bus Co Ltd [1996] UKEAT 1243_95_0411 (4 November 1996)
There is an arguable point of law that the tribunal erred by not considering the appellant's means before making a costs order, warranting consideration by the full Employment Appeal Tribunal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1996] UKEAT 1243_95_0411
- Parties
- Appellant: Thomas Frederick Brown; Respondent: Unknown Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted; matter likely to be remitted to the Industrial Tribunal for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Ability to Pay, Remittal to Tribunal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Frederick Brown
Appellant
Unknown Respondents
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred by failing to consider the appellant's ability to pay before making an order for costs
Ratio Decidendi
There is an arguable point of law that the tribunal erred by not considering the appellant's means before making a costs order, warranting consideration by the full Employment Appeal Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted; matter likely to be remitted to the Industrial Tribunal for reconsideration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment