Stockland Corporation Ltd v Lane [2009] DRS 6649 (25 March 2009)
The complainant has rights in the STOCKLAND mark, which is identical to the domain name. While the respondent did not register the domain in bad faith, his subsequent use—pointing the domain to a competitor's website—was unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights and caused confusion. This constitutes abusive registration under the DRS Policy.
- Citation
- [2009] DRS 6649
- Parties
- Complainant: Stockland Corporation Limited; Respondent: Thomas Lane
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute (nominet Drs) / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld; domain name to be transferred to complainant.
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Marks, Passing Off, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stockland Corporation Limited
Complainant
Thomas Lane
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute (nominet Drs) / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name, in the hands of the respondent, is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant has rights in the STOCKLAND mark, which is identical to the domain name. While the respondent did not register the domain in bad faith, his subsequent use—pointing the domain to a competitor's website—was unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights and caused confusion. This constitutes abusive registration under the DRS Policy.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld; domain name to be transferred to complainant.
Orders
- The domain name 'stockland.co.uk' is to be transferred to Stockland Corporation Limited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment