Machine Building Systems Ltd v Murphy [2009] DRS 7195 (07 July 2009)
The complainant has established common law trademark rights in 'Machine Building Systems' through reputation and use. The respondent, a competitor, registered domain names identical or similar to the complainant's mark and used them to lead to a website lacking clear identification, likely to mislead visitors expecting the complainant. This constitutes abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.
- Citation
- [2009] DRS 7195
- Parties
- Complainant: Machine Building Systems Ltd; Respondent: Thomas Murphy
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Registration, Passing Off, Trademark Rights, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Machine Building Systems Ltd
Complainant
Thomas Murphy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name identical or similar to the domain names
- 2 Whether the domain names are abusive registrations
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant has established common law trademark rights in 'Machine Building Systems' through reputation and use. The respondent, a competitor, registered domain names identical or similar to the complainant's mark and used them to lead to a website lacking clear identification, likely to mislead visitors expecting the complainant. This constitutes abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld
Orders
- The domain names machine-building-systems.co.uk and machinebuildingsystems.co.uk are to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment