English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd [2008] UKEAT 0556_07_2002 (20 February 2008)
Regulation 5 does not protect a claimant from harassment where the claimant is not homosexual, is not perceived to be homosexual, and the harassers do not believe him to be homosexual; the unwanted conduct was not on grounds of sexual orientation as required by the Regulation.
- Citation
- [2008] UKEAT 0556_07_2002
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Mr Stephen English; Respondent: Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination, Harassment, Interpretation of Regulations, Implementation of EU Directives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Stephen English
Appellant/claimant
Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Regulation 5 of the Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 cover harassment where the claimant is not homosexual, is not perceived to be homosexual, and the harassers do not believe him to be homosexual?
- 2 Does the Regulation properly implement Directive 2000/78/EC?
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 5 does not protect a claimant from harassment where the claimant is not homosexual, is not perceived to be homosexual, and the harassers do not believe him to be homosexual; the unwanted conduct was not on grounds of sexual orientation as required by the Regulation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal granted
- Time for appealing extended to 21 days from the date of this judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment